For our latest staff book club, we read two books that both happen within 24 hours. We read Long Way Down by Jason Reynolds and The Statistical Probability of Love at First Sight by Jennifer E. Smith. Although both fit our theme, they are vastly different. Today, we will talk with the staff about The Statistical Probability of Love at First Sight. Check out our previous discussion on Long Way Down. You can find both books in the Recreational Reading Collection on the second floor of the library. The Statistical Probability of Love at First Sight is also a movie on Netflix called Love at First Sight.
Seventeen-year-old Hadley is having one of the worst days of her life. She has missed her flight from JFK to London by only four minutes, making her late to her father’s wedding—a wedding to a soon-to-be-stepmom she’s never met nor cares to meet. But, in waiting at the crowded airport, she meets Oliver, a British college student at Yale, and they spark a connection. Over the course of twenty-four hours, their paths keep crossing and crossing again, as if intertwined.
Here is what our book club members thought:
Do you think it’s probable that people can/do fall in love at first sight? Why or why not?
Rachel, Circulation Manager, answered: I think there can be a mutual attraction and a desire to get to know them better, but I don’t think it would be love.
Kaylee, Circulation Associate, said: People can definitely find attraction at first sight, and if a genuine connection is made, there is a potential for love.
Sarah, Circulation Associate and Administrative Secretary, responded with: I think that largely depends on your definition of love. For me, I think love is something deeper that can’t really be achieved at first sight, but I do think you can be attracted to someone at first sight.
Melissa, Director For Library Services, answered: I don’t believe in love at first sight, though I certainly think there can be attraction or an immediate connection with someone. I understand love to include respect, common convictions, similar experiences and goals, and I think those things are impossible to get immediately.
Mary, Residence Life Secretary, answered: I certainly believe that attraction-at-first-sight can eventually grow into love, but actual love can’t be cultivated at first sight. (Babies are the exception, but of course, we’re talking about romantic love here.)
While the book is primarily a romance, what do you think of the theme of fathers and children in the story?
Rachel answered: I thought that added a lot to the story. For me, it made me think about how there’s always a chance that people will disappoint us, but if we have a strong foundation, the relationship can still be repaired.
Kaylee said: The subject of fatherhood balances out the more whimsical approach to romantic love. It’s the main source of conflict for our leads. Paternal love is something that can have a heavy effect on a person. Statistics show just how important having a father figure is in a child’s life, as it plays a role in childhood development. In The Statistical Probability of Love at First Sight, the lack of that strong connection deeply affects Hadley and Oliver.
Sarah responded with: The theme of fathers and children brought more nuance and substance to what would have otherwise been a sort of nondescript teen romcom to me. I feel like it fleshed out both main characters and the supporting cast around them. I was also glad to see Hadley’s relationship with her dad grow to be in a healthier place, although I feel like they had more healing ahead of them.
Melissa answered: I found it very moving, the juxtaposition of both Hadley and Oliver’s difficult relationships with their respective fathers. Since I am not much of a romance novel person, I really appreciated that part of the storyline.
Mary answered: I liked that the author included the two messy father-child relationships in the story. Although Hadley’s father had transgressed and hurt their relationship, I appreciated that he had been a good father to her in the past and desperately wanted to restore their relationship. I also liked that she began to let him in again and that there was definite hope for their future.
What do you think of the airport setting at the beginning? Do you think the story would have unfolded differently if Hadley and Oliver met somewhere else?
Rachel answered: I thought being in the airport added a uniqueness to their story because it made it where they couldn’t leave and were somewhat forced to make a connection to make the time pass better. I think they still might have hit it off, but I think being in the airport helped to escalate their connection.
Kaylee said: Settings in stories that have a hand in the plot like this one work the best in my opinion. The airport and airplane force our characters to the same physical constraints, allowing for their connection to happen.
Sarah responded with: In airports, people are in close quarters with strangers for extended periods of time. We discussed in book club that, because of the close proximity, they were more likely to have a conversation together. If their first meeting was in a coffee shop, for example, I think they would have had a nice conversation together, but would not have impacted each other’s lives in the way they did at the airport.
Melissa answered: To me, there’s something unique about being in an airport. It might be the juxtaposition of waiting for your flight while others hurry to make theirs. It’s a temporary, artificial environment that somehow makes one open to new ideas and cultures.
Mary answered: I liked the setting—the hustle and bustle and foreign-ness of an airport that any airline passenger can relate to. Yes, the story would have been quite different in most other settings. The close quarters and lack of external influences in the airplane put their new friendship in a sort of pressure cooker and accelerated everything about their encounter: what they shared in conversation, physical closeness, etc.
Did you find Hadley and Oliver likable protagonists? Why or why not?
Rachel answered: I did. They both had their weaknesses, but I felt like they balanced each other out.
Sarah responded with: I did. Both characters had other facets of their circumstances and personalities aside from their romance, so I felt like that made them both more realistic and more likable.
Melissa answered: I liked them both, but maybe especially Hadley. her struggle with her parents’ divorce and father’s subsequent remarriage was very realistic and convincing to me.
Mary answered: I found them both likeable: their openness, their banter, his willingness to help her through her anxiety.
Was there anything that surprised you about The Statistical Probability of Love at First Sight?
Rachel answered: Yes. It was fairly predictable, but I thought the author added more depth to the relationships that I expected. It was a nice surprise.
Sarah responded with: Not really. I enjoyed the book, but other than the parent/child theme weaved throughout, I thought it was a little predictable. However, I needed a light read at the moment, so I’m glad I read it.
Melissa answered: I found it surprising that I liked a romance as much as I did!
Mary answered: I was surprised that, after they saw each other at the funeral, Hadley and Oliver still didn’t exchange contact information. Additionally, I watched the Netflix movie version (loved it) before I read the book. There were changes made for the movie adaptation that I was surprised not to find in the novel. I found the changes in the movie more positive, although sad, and visually delightful. I recommend the movie!
Staff reviews reflect their personal opinions and not necessarily those of the library or university.